Key result
Omeprazole was superior to famotidine in preventing gastroduodenal mucosal breaks in high-risk low-dose aspirin users (19.8% vs 33.8%; OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.99; P=0.047).
Why the study?
Low-dose aspirin is widely used for cardiovascular prevention, but its use is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal injury.
Does omeprazole prevent gastroduodenal mucosal breaks compared to famotidine in high-risk users of low-dose aspirin?
RCT (n=170)
randomly assigned
Does omeprazole prevent gastroduodenal mucosal breaks compared to famotidine in high-risk users of low-dose aspirin?
Odds Ratio: 0.47 (95% CI 0.23–0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 19.8% vs 33.8%
p-value: p=0.047
In high-risk patients taking low-dose aspirin, omeprazole is superior to famotidine for preventing gastroduodenal mucosal breaks.
Prefer omeprazole over famotidine to prevent mucosal breaks in high-risk aspirin users; extends RCT evidence favoring PPIs for gastroprotection.
BACKGROUND: Low-dose aspirin is widely used in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, the use of aspirin is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal injury. METHODS: Low-dose aspirin users with a history of peptic ulcers who did not have gastroduodenal mucosal breaks at initial endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive famotidine (20 mg bid) or omeprazole (20 mg qd) for 6 months. Follow-up endoscopy was performed at the end of the sixth month and whenever epigastric discomfort, hematemesis, or melena occurred. The primary end point was the occurrence of gastroduodenal mucosal breaks. The secondary end points were (1) the occurrence of gastroduodenal ulcers and (2) the occurrence of gastroduodenal bleeding. RESULT: Between November 2013 and June 2018, 170 patients were randomly assigned to receive either famotidine (n = 84) or omeprazole (n = 86). The incidence of gastroduodenal mucosal breaks was 33.8% among the patients receiving famotidine, and 19.8% among those receiving omeprazole (95% CI: 0.4%-27.5%; p = 0.045). The two patient groups had comparable incidence rates of gastroduodenal ulcers (20.0% vs 9.8%; p = 0.071), and gastroduodenal bleeding (2.5% vs 0%; p = 0.243). Multivariate analysis showed that use of the proton pump inhibitor was an independent protective factor (odds ratio: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.23-0.99; p = 0.047), and that smoking was a risk factor for mucosal breaks (odds ratio: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.52-9.71; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Proton pump inhibitor was superior to histamine-2 receptor antagonist in the prevention of gastroduodenal mucosal breaks in high-risk users of low-dose aspirin, and smoking was an independent risk factor for developing gastroduodenal mucosal breaks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tseng et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in high-risk users of low-dose aspirin with a history of peptic ulcers (n=170). omeprazole vs. famotidine (20 mg bid) was evaluated on occurrence of gastroduodenal mucosal breaks (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.99, p=0.047). Omeprazole was superior to famotidine in preventing gastroduodenal mucosal breaks in high-risk low-dose aspirin users (19.8% vs 33.8%; OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.99; P=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: