Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This aim of this numerical study is to control the separated flow over a generic missile fin characterized by a sweep angle of 50 deg and a sharp leading edge. The flow without control separates at the leading edge and the fin is stalled. To control the flow separation, a blowing slot is placed all along the fin leading edge, and both continuous and pulsed blowing are applied. The nondimensional frequencies F + based on the freestream velocity and the root chord of the fin are equal to 1, 1.5, 3, 6, and 10. Applying continuous blowing results in a larger reverse-flow region than in the reference case. As a consequence, the aerodynamic performance of the fin is deteriorated. Conversely, using pulsed blowing tends to decrease the pressure over the fin and the extent of the reverse-flow region. The performance of the fin is then enhanced, particularly for a pulsing frequency equal to that of natural vortex-shedding (F + = 1.5). Finally, the last part of the paper discusses the effects of the suction phase by comparing synthetic-jet actuation and pulsed blowing at the optimal frequency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riou et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: