Key result
Rhythm management algorithms designed to reduce right ventricular pacing burden offer clinical benefits but require careful utilization to avoid potential adverse phenomena.
Provides a comprehensive overview of the technical properties, clinical benefits, and potential adverse effects of algorithms designed to minimize right ventricular pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians must weigh algorithm benefits against potential adverse effects; review extends technical understanding but leaves optimal use open pending prospective data.
Algorithms designed to reduce the burden of right ventricular pacing are widely available in modern implantable pacing devices. To ensure safe and optimal utilization, understanding the properties of these algorithms as well as their possible unfavourable effects is essential. In this review, we discuss in detail the technical and clinical aspects of rhythm management algorithms and update on their significant recent modifications. In addition, we highlight possible adverse phenomena that may be induced by these different pacing algorithms intended to minimize pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jankelson et al. (2018) conducted a review in Right ventricular pacing. Rhythm management algorithms to reduce right ventricular pacing was evaluated. Rhythm management algorithms designed to reduce right ventricular pacing burden offer clinical benefits but require careful utilization to avoid potential adverse phenomena.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: