Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper proposes two enhanced architectures for spin-orbit torque nonvolatile flip-flop (SOT-NVFF), namely, parallel programming scheme (pSOT-NVFF) and series programming scheme (sSOT-NVFF). At given SOT magnetic tunnel junction (SOT-MTJ) technology, the pSOT-NVFF achieves 29% lower backup energy with nearly 50% shorter backup delay compared with previous parallel architectures and the sSOT-NVFF offers at least 42% lower backup energy with 52% higher speed compared with others. Further analysis of the two proposed architectures showed a preferred window of operation for each architecture as a function of heavy metal electrode resistance (RHM). In particular, sSOT-NVFF is preferred, from speed and energy perspectives, for SOT-MTJs with small RHM(i.e., hundreds of Ω to tens of kQ), while pSOT-NVFF is preferred for SOT-MTJs with large RHMin the range of hundreds of kQ. Further study indicates that our NVFF is robust, stable, and functional even with process variations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: