Why the study?
Does preoperative assessment and treatment of coronary artery disease improve survival in patients undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Does preoperative assessment and treatment of coronary artery disease improve survival in patients undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Preoperative screening and management of CAD in patients undergoing elective AAA repair can mitigate the high risk of cardiac events, resulting in mid-term survival comparable to patients without CAD.
Supports preoperative CAD assessment in elective AAA repair; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of survival benefit.
In the process of establishing a less invasive assessment strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), the incidence of CAD and the surgical and mid-term outcomes were reviewed. From January 1994 through September 2001, 94 elective surgical repairs of AAA were carried out. Preoperative coronary angiography showed 43 patients (45.7%) had CAD: 29 (67.4%) were asymptomatic, 23 had single-vessel disease (1VD), 12 had 2VD and 8 had 3VD. Of the 43 patients with CAD, 19 (44.2%) underwent coronary interventional therapy before aortic surgery (11 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 8 coronary artery bypass grafting). Eight asymptomatic patients underwent coronary interventional therapy. None of the patients died of cardiac causes or experienced a postoperative cardiac event. During the follow-up period, 10 late deaths occurred: 7 patients with CAD, and 3 cerebrovascular or cardiac deaths. There was no statistical difference in the survival rate between the groups with and without CAD. Two patients with CAD underwent PTCA during the follow-up period. The findings confirm the need for a less invasive assessment strategy of CAD that does not overlook asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, because the incidence of CAD in patients with AAA is high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kioka et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: