Key result
Abdominal aortoiliac calcification in patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusion was associated with increased odds of postoperative medical complications (34.8% vs 13.3%; OR 2.62, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Surgeons are cautious when performing anterior lumbar fusions in patients with aortoiliac calcifications due to concerns about perioperative vascular complications and concomitant medical comorbidities.
Does the presence of abdominal aortoiliac calcification increase the risk of perioperative vascular and medical complications in patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusion?
Cohort (n=482)
No
Does the presence of abdominal aortoiliac calcification increase the risk of perioperative vascular and medical complications in patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusion?
Odds Ratio: 2.62
Absolute Event Rate: 34.8% vs 13.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusion, the presence of abdominal aortoiliac calcification does not increase direct vascular complications but is associated with a significantly higher risk of perioperative medical complications.
Background: The anterior approaches to lumbar arthrodesis, including direct anterior (ALIF) and antepsoas (ATP)/oblique (OLIF) fusions, require careful manipulation of the abdominal prevertebral vessels for safe and adequate spinal access. Therefore, surgeons who perform anterior lumbar fusions in patients with aortoiliac calcifications are often cautious due to concerns for perioperative vascular complications, as well as the associated risks of concomitant medical comorbidities. This study sought to compare the incidence of perioperative vascular and medical complications in patients with and without abdominal aortoiliac calcification (AAC) undergoing the minimally invasive antepsoas (MIS-ATP) lumbosacral fusion. Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study including 482 adult patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusions at a single institution between 2014 and 2020 (227 with AAC and 255 without AAC), matched by sex and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores. Through preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs, using Kaupilla et al.'s AAC grading system, we graded anterior and posterior aortic wall calcification from L1 to L4. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify and collect the perioperative complications. Results: While there was no occurrence of intraoperative vascular injuries in either group, patients with AAC were more likely to develop medical complication (34.8% vs. 13.3%, p < .001), with anemia (18.9% vs. 9.2%), ileus (16.3% vs. 2.7%) and acute kidney injury (6.6% vs. 5.5%) being the most common. Overall, individuals with AAC had 2.62 times increased odds of developing a postoperative medical complication. Moreover, moderate AAC was found to be a significant risk factor (OR = 3.48). Conclusions: Presence of AAC in patients undergoing MIS-ATP fusion was not associated with increased risk of direct surgical or exposure related vascular complications. However, patients with AAC were significantly more likely to experience medical complications following MIS-ATP fusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tannoury et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusions (n=482). Abdominal aortoiliac calcification (AAC) vs. No abdominal aortoiliac calcification was evaluated on Postoperative medical complication (OR 2.62, p=<0.001). Abdominal aortoiliac calcification in patients undergoing MIS-ATP lumbosacral fusion was associated with increased odds of postoperative medical complications (34.8% vs 13.3%; OR 2.62, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: