Key result
A standardized discharge handoff tool did not significantly reduce 30-day readmissions for index discharges (20.0% vs 26.8%, p=0.12) but reduced overall readmissions (25.7% vs 51.2%, p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis face high hospital readmission rates, partly driven by poor communication between hospitals and outpatient dialysis facilities.
Does a standardized discharge handoff tool and e-faxing reduce 30-day hospital readmissions in patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis?
Cohort (n=217)
No
Does a standardized discharge handoff tool and e-faxing reduce 30-day hospital readmissions in patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis?
A standardized discharge handoff tool for dialysis patients showed high uptake and may reduce overall 30-day readmissions, though it did not significantly reduce readmissions for the index discharge alone.
BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis encounter high hospital readmission rates. One contributor is poor communication between hospitals and outpatient dialysis facilities. We hypothesized that improved communication may reduce 30-day hospital readmissions for patients on dialysis at an urban, safety net hospital. METHODS: We created a standardized discharge handoff tool that is easy to use and provides concise data for dialysis centers. The handoff tool is a novel, electronic MACRO template (called a "dot-phrase") to be included in discharge documentation. Instructions for the dot-phrase and electronic facsimile (e-faxing) were sent to Internal Medicine residents immediately prior to their rotation on an inpatient Renal service. We then measured the intervention implementation rate and its impact on hospital readmission metrics. RESULTS: We compared 3 months of preintervention and 6 months of postintervention data, identifying 82 and 135 index discharges in each respective study period. Patients were predominantly male (56.2%) and receiving hemodialysis (89.8%); a minority (9.2%) were undomiciled at the time of discharge. Mean age was 60.5 years (SD 14.0). Renal discharges followed by 30-day Renal readmission were not statistically lower in the postintervention group for the index discharge alone (26.8% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.12), but were for overall discharges (51.2% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.0001). The dot-phrase was used in 95.4% of discharge summaries, and 74.7% of discharge summaries were e-faxed within 24 h of discharge. CONCLUSION: There was high uptake of a standardized discharge handoff tool among Internal Medicine residents on a Renal inpatient service. Using a handoff tool and e-faxing may improve communication with outpatient dialysis centers and may reduce readmissions among some patients but is likely insufficient to fully address high readmission rates. Subsequent intervention iterations would benefit from further collaboration with outpatient dialysis units for customization of the handoff tool to meet local communication needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claudel et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in End-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis (n=217). Standardized discharge handoff tool and e-faxing vs. Preintervention (usual care) was evaluated on 30-day Renal readmission for the index discharge alone (p=0.12). A standardized discharge handoff tool did not significantly reduce 30-day readmissions for index discharges (20.0% vs 26.8%, p=0.12) but reduced overall readmissions (25.7% vs 51.2%, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: