Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, progress has been made to demonstrate feasibility and benefits of including real‐time GPS (rtGPS) in earthquake early warning and rapid response systems. Most concepts, however, have yet to be integrated into operational environments. The Berkeley Seismological Laboratory runs an rtGPS‐based finite fault inversion scheme in real time. This system (G‐larmS) detected the 2014 Mw 6.0 South Napa earthquake in California. We review G‐larmS' performance during this event and 13 aftershocks and present rtGPS observations and real‐time modeling results for the main shock. The first distributed slip model and magnitude estimates were available 24s after the event origin time, which, after optimizations, was reduced to 14s (≈8s S wave travel time, ≈6s data latency). G‐larmS' solutions for the aftershocks (that had no measurable surface displacements) demonstrate that, in combination with the seismic early warning magnitude, Mw 6.0 is our current resolution limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grapenthin et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: