Key result
Female sex was associated with more severe strokes (mean NIHSS 6.2 vs 5.3; p=0.01) and stroke mimics (21% vs 15%; p=0.01) compared to men, but no significant differences in clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Sex differences in acute ischemic stroke are of increasing interest in the era of precision medicine, prompting an exploration of sex disparities in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.
Are there sex differences in baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke?
RCT (n=1,100)
Open-label, blinded endpoint
Randomized
Are there sex differences in baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke?
Despite presenting with more severe strokes and a higher rate of stroke mimics, women treated with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke had similar clinical outcomes to men.
Supports equitable thrombolysis outcomes by sex despite greater severity in women; leaves open sex-stratified predictors in future cohorts.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sex differences in acute ischemic stroke is of increasing interest in the era of precision medicine. We aimed to explore sex disparities in baseline characteristics, management and outcomes in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis included in the Norwegian Tenecteplase trial (NOR-TEST). METHODS: NOR-TEST was an open-label, randomized, blinded endpoint trial, performed from 2012 to 2016, comparing treatment with tenecteplase to treatment with alteplase within 4.5 h after acute ischemic stroke symptom onset. Sex differences at baseline, treatment and outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression models. Heterogeneity in treatment was evaluated by including an interaction term in the model. RESULTS: Of 1100 patients enrolled, 40% were women, and in patients aged >80 years, the proportion of women was greater than men (19% vs. 14%; p = 0.02). Women had a lower burden of cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus (11% vs. 15%; p = 0.05) and a higher mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (1.7 ± 0.6 mmol/L vs. 1.3 ± 0.4 mmol/L; p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of women had never smoked (45% vs. 33%; p < 0.001) compared with men. While there was no sex difference in time from onset of symptoms to admission, door to needle time or in-hospital workup, women were admitted with more severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 6.2 ± 5.6 vs. 5.3 ± 5.1; p = 0.01). Stroke mimic diagnosis was more common in women (21% vs. 15%; p = 0.01). There were no significant sex differences in clinical outcome, measured by the NIHSS, the modified Rankin Scale, intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. CONCLUSION: Women were underrepresented in number in NOR-TEST. The included women had a lower cardiovascular risk factor burden and more severe strokes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ihle‐Hansen et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke (n=1,100). Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase was evaluated on Clinical outcome (NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality). Female sex was associated with more severe strokes (mean NIHSS 6.2 vs 5.3; p=0.01) and stroke mimics (21% vs 15%; p=0.01) compared to men, but no significant differences in clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: