Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A prototype instrument has been developed for online analysis of water-soluble Fe(II) (WS_Fe(II)) in atmospheric aerosols using a particle-into-liquid-sampler (PILS), which concentrates particles into a small flow of purified water, coupled with a liquid waveguide capillary cell (LWCC) and absorbance spectrophotometryto detect iron-ferrozine colored complexes. The analytical method is highly precise (<3% RSD), and the overall measurement uncertainty and limit of detection for the complete PILS-LWCC system are estimated at 12% and 4.6 ng m(-3), respectively. The online measurements compared well with those of 24 h integrated filter samples collected at two different sampling sites (n=27, R2 = 0.82, slope 0.90 +/- 0.08, and intercept 3.08 +/- 1.99 ng m(-3)). In urban Atlanta, fine particle WS_Fe(II) concentrations measured every 12 min exhibited large variability, ranging from below the detection limit (4.6) to 370 ng m(-3) during a 24 day period in June 2008. This instrument provides new capabilities for investigating the sources and atmospheric processing of fine particle WS_Fe(II) and may prove useful in studies ranging from effects of particle WS_Fe(II) on human health to effects of particle WS_Fe(II) on atmospheric chemistry and ocean biogeochemistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rastogi et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: