Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Few studies investigating the rate of neurocognitive (NC) impairment in effectively treated neuro-asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects have been performed. METHODS: We assessed NC function via a computerized cognitive test in HIV-infected subjects on stable combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with plasma HIV RNA<50 copies/mL for at least 3 months. Neurologically symptomatic subjects were excluded. Current cART was evaluated for drug class (protease inhibitor [PI]- vs non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]-based) and Clinical Penetration Effectiveness (CPE) score. NC impairment was defined as a NC domain score>1 SD below mean age-matched population scores in at least 2 cognitive domains and global NC composite z-score calculated. Associations between NC scores and clinical parameters were evaluated using linear regression. RESULTS: 101 (88% male) subjects participated. Median (IQR) age was 53 (43-62) years, with current CD4+ 525 (373-710) and nadir CD4+ 185 (83-260) cells/µL. 25 subjects (25%) had chronic hepatitis C. Median (IQR) CPE score was 1.5 (1.5-2.5), and 53% were receiving NNRTI-based cART. Overall 19 (19%) subjects had NC impairment. No association between presence of NC impairment and clinical parameters were observed (P>.14, all values). Poorer global NC composite z-score was independently associated with lower nadir CD4+ lymphocyte count (P=.04) and older age (P<.001) but not other study parameters (P>.10 all values). CONCLUSION: In neuro-asymptomatic HIV-infected adults on stable cART, rates of NC impairment are low. HIV disease status (lower nadir CD4+ count) and older age, but not CPE score or cART drug class, are associated with poorer NC performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garvey et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: