Key result
In patients undergoing major open urological procedures, pre-operative co-morbidity indices correlated with POSSUM but not with the surgical Apgar score.
Why the study?
Pre-operative co-morbidity may contribute to case risk diversity and affect immediate peri-operative metrics and morbidity and mortality, but its correlation with these metrics in urological patients required estimation.
Observational (n=100)
Pre-operative co-morbidity indices correlate with POSSUM but not with the surgical Apgar score in patients undergoing major open urological procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preoperative comorbidity may confound performance metrics; leaves open whether adjusted scores improve fair assessment in low-level evidence.
Background:Individual surgeon and institutional performance are usually assessed by morbidity and mortality rates, which can be calculated using peri-operative metrics, such as POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of mortality and morbidity). Post-operative risk can be estimated using the surgical Apgar outcome score. However, pre-operative co-morbidity may contribute to case risk diversity and affect immediate peri-operative metrics and short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. We estimated the correlation between pre-operative co-morbidity or risk assessment indices and peri-operative metrics in urological patients. Material and Methods:The study included 100 consecutive patients (80.8% males, mean age ± SD 66.3 ± 10.7 years, range 30 - 88 years) undergoing major open urological procedures (39 nephrectomies, 43 radical prostatectomies, 18 radical cystectomies). Pre-operative co-morbidity was assessed using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), age-adjusted CCI (AA-CCI), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), and Index of Co-Existent Diseases (ICED). Pre-operative risk was assessed with the American Society of Anesthesiologists index (ASA). Functional status was quantified based on estimation of the metabolic equivalent (MET). Peri-operative metrics included POSSUM and surgical Apgar scores. Results: All pre-operative indices significantly correlated with POSSUM, but none correlated with the surgical Apgar score. Conclusions:In patients undergoing major open urological procedures, risk stratification in the post-operative setting using the surgical Apgar score is independent of pre-operative co-morbidity status. In contrast, pre-operative co-morbidity and risk assessment correlated with peri-operative metrics used to calculate morbidity and mortality risk. Reports of death and complication rates do not take into account case diversity and, therefore, should be adjusted for co-morbidity status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarri et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Urological patients undergoing major open procedures (n=100). Pre-operative co-morbidity indices was evaluated on Correlation with POSSUM and surgical Apgar scores. In patients undergoing major open urological procedures, pre-operative co-morbidity indices correlated with POSSUM but not with the surgical Apgar score.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: