Key result
Erector spinae plane block reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared to no block or sham in patients undergoing midline sternotomies.
Why the study?
Use of non-neuraxial blocks such as erector spinae plane block has been increasing in cardiac surgeries, warranting evaluation of its perioperative analgesic effectiveness in midline sternotomies.
Does erector spinae plane block reduce postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries with midline sternotomies?
Meta-Analysis (n=226)
Does erector spinae plane block reduce postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries with midline sternotomies?
Erector spinae plane block may be an effective adjunct for perioperative analgesia in midline sternotomies, significantly reducing postoperative opioid consumption and early pain scores, though evidence is currently limited.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ESPB to reduce opioid consumption after cardiac surgery; extends RCT evidence for non-neuraxial blocks in this setting.
With the advancements in regional anesthesia and ultrasound techniques, the use of non-neuraxial blocks like the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been increasing in cardiac surgeries with promising outcomes. A total of 3,264 articles were identified through a literature search. Intervention was defined as ESPB. Comparators were no regional technique performed or sham blocks. Four studies with a total of 226 patients were included. Postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the group that received ESPB than the group that did not (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -204.08; 95% CI: -239.98 to -168.19; P < 0.00001). Intraoperative opioid consumption did not differ between the two groups (WMD: -398.14; 95% CI: -812.17 to 15.98; P = 0.06). Pain scores at 0 hours were lower in the group that received ESPB than the group that did not (WMD: -1.27; 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.56; P = 0.0005). Pain scores did not differ between the two groups at 4-6 hours (WMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.70 to 0.13; P = 0.09) and 12 hours (WMD: -0.83; 95% CI: -1.82 to 0.16; P = 0.10). Duration of mechanical ventilation in minutes was lower in the group that received ESPB than the group that did not (WMD: -45.12; 95% CI: -68.82 to -21.43; P = 0.0002). Given the limited number of studies and the substantial heterogeneity of measured outcomes and interventions, further studies are required to assess the benefit of ESPB in midline sternotomies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in midline sternotomies (n=226). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. no regional technique performed or sham blocks was evaluated on Postoperative opioid consumption (WMD -204.08, 95% CI -239.98 to -168.19, p=< 0.00001). Erector spinae plane block reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared to no block or sham in patients undergoing midline sternotomies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: