Key result
Peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) predicted vascular stiffness with an AUC of 0.7119 (P=0.006), compared to an AUC of 0.6960 (P=0.011) for abdominal aortic calcification score.
Why the study?
Does the peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) predict vascular stiffness better than the abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) in peritoneal dialysis patients?
Observational (n=79)
Does the peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) predict vascular stiffness better than the abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) in peritoneal dialysis patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.7119% vs 0.696%
The peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) using plain radiographs is a better predictor of vascular stiffness than the abdominal aortic calcification score in peritoneal dialysis patients.
PVCS may modestly outperform AACS for stiffness prediction in peritoneal dialysis; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation.
AIM: Vascular stiffness is associated with cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients and related with vascular calcification and microvascular inflammation. The objective of this study is to compare predictability of two different vascular calcification scoring systems using plain radiographs in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: Vascular stiffness was represented by heart-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (hfPWV) in our 79 PD patients. Peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) and abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) were measured from plain radiographs. Microvascular inflammation was represented by peritoneal protein clearance (PPC). Regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for analysis. RESULTS: The hfPWV revealed correlation with PVCS and AACS independently. In the ROC curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) of PVC score was 0.7119 (P = 0.006), and AUC of AACS were 0.6960 (P = 0.011). After multiple linear regression analysis, PVCS remained as a predictor of vascular stiffness (R(2) = 0.579, β = 0.210, P = 0.038). The combination of PVCS and PPC exhibited a trend toward better predictability for vascular stiffness (AUC 0.7738, P = 0.001) than any of the two parameters alone. CONCLUSION: It is assumed that the PVCS system is more predictable for vascular stiffness in our study. Moreover, the combination of PVCS and PPC might be more useful as a screening test for vascular stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Peritoneal dialysis (n=79). Peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) vs. Abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) was evaluated on Predictability of vascular stiffness (heart-to-femoral pulse wave velocity). Peripheral vascular calcification score (PVCS) predicted vascular stiffness with an AUC of 0.7119 (P=0.006), compared to an AUC of 0.6960 (P=0.011) for abdominal aortic calcification score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: