Objective Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) and Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEPs) in detecting overall neurological deficits when used individually, their pathway-specific accuracy (TcMEPs for motor deficits, SSEPs for sensory deficits), their complementary roles when combined in multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM), including cross-modality detection, during intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) resection. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA-DTA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through March 20, 2025. Diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, and log diagnostic odds ratio) were extracted from 2×2 contingency tables. Pooled estimates were calculated using bivariate random-effects models. Comparative analyses between modalities were performed using Z-tests. Results We included 29 studies with 1537 cases monitored by IONM, of which 497 (32.3%) experienced postoperative neurological deficits. Multimodal IONM surpassed single modalities in all comparisons with statistical significance, showing superior sensitivity (83.9%, 95% CI: 76.8–89.2) while maintaining high specificity (84.2 95% CI: 66.3-92.3). It demonstrated the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.29), and strong discriminative performance (log DOR 3.648, AUC 86.6%). Heterogeneity (I 2 ) varied from 0% to 55.6% across modalities. Conclusion Multimodal IONM combining SSEP and TcMEP provides superior diagnostic accuracy compared to TcMEP or SSEP monitoring alone during IMSCT resection. Its enhanced ability to detect postoperative neurological deficits supports its routine use as the optimal intraoperative monitoring approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Addanki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: