Key result
In patients with intra-cardiac abscesses complicating infective endocarditis, 30-day surgical mortality was 17%, and the choice of surgical technique (AVR vs ARR) was not associated with survival, re-infection, or re-operation.
Why the study?
Intra-cardiac abscess is a serious complication of infective endocarditis, but controversies remain regarding the optimal timing and type of operation.
Does aortic root replacement compared to aortic valve replacement improve outcomes in patients with aortic root abscesses complicating infective endocarditis?
Observational (n=59)
No
Does aortic root replacement compared to aortic valve replacement improve outcomes in patients with aortic root abscesses complicating infective endocarditis?
In patients with intra-cardiac abscesses complicating infective endocarditis, surgical intervention is essential for survival, and outcomes are similar whether aortic valve replacement or aortic root replacement is performed.
Non-operative management of intra-cardiac abscess links to high mortality; leaves open optimal surgical timing and technique in this observational cohort.
Background An intra-cardiac abscess is a serious complication of both native (NV-IE) and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PV-IE). Despite being an accepted indication for surgery, controversies remain regarding the optimal timing and type of operation. We aimed to report the outcomes of patients managed for intra-cardiac abscesses over more than a decade. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years managed for intra-cardiac abscess between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2017 were identified from a prospectively collected IE database. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality in operated patients and secondary outcomes were freedom from re-infection, re-operation and long-term mortality comparing those patients with aortic root abscess who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and those who received aortic root replacement (ARR). Results Fifty-nine patients developed an intra-cardiac abscess, and their median age was 55 (43–71) years; among them, 44 (75%) were men, and 10 (17%) were persons who injected drugs. Infection with beta-haemolytic streptococci was associated with NV-IE (p= 0.009) and coagulase-negative staphylococci with PV-IE (p= 0.005). Forty-four (75%) underwent an operation, and among those with aortic root abscess, 27 underwent AVR and 12 ARR. Thirty-day mortality was associated with infection withS. aureus(p= 0.006) but not the type or timing of the operation. Survival in operated patients was 66% at 1 year and 59% at 5 years. In operated patients, none had a relapse, although six developed late recurrence. Freedom from infection, re-operation and long-term mortality were similar in patients undergoing AVR compared to ARR. Conclusion Patients diagnosed with intra-cardiac abscess who were not operated on had very poor survival. In those who underwent an operation, either by AVR or ARR based upon patient factors, imaging and intra-operative findings outcomes were similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Straw et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Intra-cardiac abscess complicating infective endocarditis (n=59). Surgical operation (Aortic valve replacement or Aortic root replacement) vs. Conservative management (no operation) was evaluated on 30-day surgical mortality. In patients with intra-cardiac abscesses complicating infective endocarditis, 30-day surgical mortality was 17%, and the choice of surgical technique (AVR vs ARR) was not associated with survival, re-infection, or re-operation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: