Key result
Telemedicine and remote interventions for type 1 diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic showed reassuring results for glycemic management and hemoglobin A1c reductions.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare delivery for chronic diseases, coinciding with advances in diabetes technologies that enabled telemedicine.
Does telemedicine and diabetes technology improve glycemic management in patients with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Does telemedicine and diabetes technology improve glycemic management in patients with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Telemedicine and diabetes technology provided effective glycemic management for type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic, though long-term data and infrastructure support are still needed.
The new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed a great burden on health care systems worldwide and is an enormous and real obstacle in providing needed health care to patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Parallel to COVID-19, there have been great advances in technology used for management of type 1 diabetes, primarily insulin pumps, sensors, integrated and closed loop systems, ambulatory glucose profile software, and smart phone apps providing necessary essentials for telemedicine implementation right at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of these remote interventions are reassuring in terms of glycemic management and hemoglobin A1c reductions. However, data on long-term outcomes and cost reductions are missing as well as proper technical infrastructure and government health policy support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilić-Čurčić et al. (2021) conducted a review in Type 1 diabetes. Telemedicine and remote interventions was evaluated. Telemedicine and remote interventions for type 1 diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic showed reassuring results for glycemic management and hemoglobin A1c reductions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: