Key result
Macitentan reduced the risk of a morbidity or mortality event by 45% compared with placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Why the study?
Although macitentan is approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension, direct comparisons with other ERAs are lacking, and its long-term effects, safety, pediatric efficacy, and place in combination therapy remain under active investigation.
Does macitentan reduce the risk of morbidity or mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does macitentan reduce the risk of morbidity or mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Effect estimate: 45% risk reduction
Macitentan is an effective dual endothelin receptor antagonist that significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Macitentan may lower PAH morbidity risk; leaves open need for comparative long-term data in broader populations.
Macitentan (10 mg once daily orally), a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) developed by modifying the structure of bosentan to increase the efficacity and safety, is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The pivotal SERAPHIN trial, (a landmark trial in the history of PAH trials because of the large number of included patients, the long-term follow up and the first trial with morbidity/mortality as the primary endpoint) showed a reduction of the risk of a morbidity or mortality event by 45% over the treatment time compared with placebo. The positive effect on the primary endpoint was observed whether or not the patient was already on PAH therapy. There has been no direct comparison between macitentan and other ERAs, which were approved based on improved exercise capacity, but preclinical and clinical data suggest better pharmacological and safety profiles. Further analyses of the SERAPHIN trial investigated the predictive value of different indices and events on long-term outcome and mortality. The efficacy in children, the long-term effects and safety of macitentan and its place in combination therapy compared with other ERAs are still under investigation. This review presents the preclinical evidence of superiority of macitentan compared with other ERAs, and the available clinical trial data. The place of macitentan in the therapeutic algorithm for PAH treatment, post-marketing experience and future perspectives are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belge et al. (2019) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Macitentan vs. Placebo was evaluated on Morbidity or mortality event (45% risk reduction). Macitentan reduced the risk of a morbidity or mortality event by 45% compared with placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: