Why the study?
Does an off-line digital computer system using joint probability provide accurate ECG diagnoses compared to physician interpretation?
Does an off-line digital computer system using joint probability provide accurate ECG diagnoses compared to physician interpretation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An early off-line computer system for ECG diagnosis demonstrated over 80% agreement with physician interpretations, highlighting the potential for automated systems to improve diagnostic reproducibility.
A study was made to establish an off-line system for the ECG diagnosis by digital computer. The joint probability was used as the main diagnostic logic, which was composed of the tailed probability. In this system, diagnoses by computer in 1392 ECG's consisted with those by physician's in more than eighty per cent. It was poined out that computer diagnoses are necessary to bring the reproducibility and accuracy in diagnosis to higher level in the various fields of the clinical medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasui et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: