Why the study?
Does an OCT-derived plaque vulnerability score accurately identify culprit lesions of acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Does an OCT-derived plaque vulnerability score accurately identify culprit lesions of acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes?
An OCT-derived score combining minimal fibrous cap thickness, lipid arc, macrophages, and lipid plaque length can accurately identify vulnerable culprit lesions in patients with type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes are at a high risk for acute cardiovascular events, which usually arise from the rupture of a vulnerable coronary lesion characterized by specific morphological plaque features. Thus, the identification of vulnerable plaques is of utmost clinical importance in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, there is currently no scoring system available to identify vulnerable lesions based on plaque characteristics. Thus, we aimed to characterize the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) - derived lesion characteristics to quantify plaque vulnerability both as individual parameters and when combined to a score in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: OCT was performed in the coronary culprit lesions of 112 patients with type 2 diabetes. The score, which quantifies plaque vulnerability, was defined as the predicted probability that a lesion is the cause for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (vs. stable angina (SAP)) based on its specific plaque morphology. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that plaque vulnerability was independently predicted by the minimal fibrous cap thickness overlying a lesion's lipid core (odds ratio (OR) per 10 μm 0.478, p = 0.002), the medium lipid arc (OR per 90° 13.997, p < 0.001), the presence of macrophages (OR 4.797, p = 0.015) and the lipid plaque length (OR 1.290, p = 0.098). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to present a score to quantify lesion vulnerability in patients with type 2 diabetes. This score may be a valuable adjunct in decision-making and useful in guiding coronary interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burgmaier et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: