What question did this study set out to answer?

To resolve literature controversies surrounding the primary structural units and bonding characteristics present in amorphous vitreous and liquid vanadium pentoxide.

September 1, 1984Philosophical Magazine B

The structure of vitreous and liquid V2O5

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

AWAdrian C. WrightUniversity of Exeter

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Critical review reveals unresolved structural units across vitreous and liquid vanadium pentoxide diffraction studies, highlighting the need for unambiguous bonding characterization.

Key Points

To resolve literature controversies surrounding the primary structural units and bonding characteristics present in amorphous vitreous and liquid vanadium pentoxide.
Comparative critical review of published X-ray diffraction studies examining vitreous and liquid V2O5.
Evaluation of recent structural models and diffraction analyses, including interpretations proposed by Mosset et al. (1982).
Significant discrepancies persist among published X-ray diffraction analyses regarding the fundamental coordination unit of non-crystalline V2O5.
Available diffraction evidence remains inadequate to definitively specify the short-range atomic ordering and bonding configurations in either the vitreous or liquid phase.

Cite This Study

Adrian C. Wright (1984) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9930ca38b9b8dc372003fe https://doi.org/10.1080/13642818408238853

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Critical review reveals unresolved structural units across vitreous and liquid vanadium pentoxide diffraction studies, highlighting the need for unambiguous bonding characterization.

The structure of vitreous and liquid V2O5

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The structure of vitreous and liquid V2O5

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider