Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ab initio calculations at MP2/6-31G*, B3LYP/6-31G*, and B3LYP/6-311+G** levels indicate relatively high potential barriers for the intramolecular rearrangement of B 9 H 9 2 - via the single DSD (diamond−square−diamond) or the double DSD mechanism, 28.4 and 21.3 kcal/mol, respectively. However, its open face-protonated form, B 9 H 10 - ( 2b ) is highly fluctional. Two other minima, 2a ( C 2 v ) and 2c ( C 3 v ) have energies 1.1 and 9.7 kcal/mol higher than 2b . Facile rotation of the BH 2 group in 2a is coupled with reversible opening of the boron cage from the closo to a nido form. Structure 2c, with a face-bound proton, is a very shallow minimum along the degenerate rearrangement pathway of 2b . None of the optimized structures of B 9 H 10 - give calculated 11 B chemical shifts corresponding to experiment; the NMR assignments and interpretation need to be refined. Members of the B n H n +1 - series ( n = 6−8, 10, and 12) have both common as well as specific features. All B n H n +1 - species are fluxional, due to rapid proton migration. The additional hydrogen H* rotates over the whole boron octahedron in B 6 H 7 - and over one side of the bipyramid in B 7 H 8 - . In B 10 H 11 -, the “extra” hydrogen H* migrates around the faces of a “polar region” near the apical borons more readily than from pole to the other; as in B 9 H 10 -, H* migration in B 8 H 9 - is accompanied by a skeletal rearrangement. The proton affinities (PA) in the B n H n 2 - series decrease with increasing size, since the Coulomb repulsion in the dianions becomes smaller and the coordination number at the protonation sites increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mebel et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: