Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review demonstrates limited cross-domain deployment and modest hazard classification gains for agentic artificial intelligence in climate-resilient cities, highlighting an operational gap.
Cities face pressure from urban growth and climate risk, yet deployed systems stay single-domain and reactive. This PRISMA-guided rapid review applies operationalized criteria to separate Agentic AI from conventional machine learning for SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). Agentic AI is defined by four properties: task-level autonomy, goal-directed planning, tool use, and multi-agent coordination; evidencing at least two marks a system as fully agentic. A two-tier search across five databases with backward citation tracking returned 896 records (2018–2026), of which 60 met the eligibility criteria and 14 satisfied the agentic threshold. The corpus is stratified by study type with a threshold sensitivity analysis. Two contributions follow: a reference architecture specifying how an agentic layer and an urban digital twin exchange state, and a real-data feasibility study on the SEVIR archive testing whether multimodal fusion improves hazard classification. On real data the proposed model is the best-ranked of four but only marginally exceeds a no-change persistence baseline, giving the assumption weak support, not operational evidence. The review reveals a field growing sharply since 2023, clustered in a few urban and climate domains, with almost no validated cross-domain deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: