Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metabolomic profiling reveals non-stigma floral adulteration in commercial saffron botanicals, demonstrating the value of anatomically anchored models for quality control.
Phytochemical variability complicates quality assessment of botanical ingredients, particularly when authenticated reference materials are limited. Saffron ( Crocus sativus L.), used both as a spice and as a food supplement ingredient, exhibits marked compositional differences across its floral parts, making evaluation of compositional balance essential for quality control and authentication. Here, saffron-based botanicals were profiled by LC-TWIMS-HRMS and evaluated within a floral part-anchored multivariate framework. Sixty-eight metabolites were tentatively identified across stigma, petal, and stamen reference tissues and nine commercial botanicals. Principal component analysis of log-transformed data revealed a dominant stigma-petal compositional gradient. Botanicals were projected onto the direction defined by anatomical centroids, and the robustness of directional estimates was assessed through compound-level and macro-class resampling. Orthogonal residual decomposition was used to characterize compositional variance not captured by the primary gradient. Most botanicals remained closely aligned with the stigma reference profile. A subset showed reproducible displacement toward petal-associated chemical patterns, driven by coordinated enrichment of flavonoids and anthocyanins relative to crocins, consistent with the presence of non-stigma floral material. These findings demonstrate that anatomically anchored chemical mapping combined with structured multivariate modelling can detect and characterize compositional deviations in saffron-based botanicals under conditions of limited reference availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gjoni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: