Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals strong links between transformational leadership and learning environments in secondary school teachers, indicating the primary value of intellectual stimulation.
This study investigated the relationship between transformational leadership and the educational environment in private secondary schools in Bethlehem Governorate, Palestine. A descriptive-analytical, cross-sectional survey design was employed. The population comprised 483 teachers, of whom 214 were selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using a 55-item questionnaire measuring four transformational-leadership dimensions—idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration, and intellectual stimulation—and two educational-environment dimensions: human and non-human elements. Statistically significant item–dimension and dimension–total correlations supported construct validity, and the instrument demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .971). The findings showed high levels of transformational leadership (M = 3.87, SD = .951), with inspirational motivation ranking first (M = 3.93), and educational-environment quality (M = 3.97, SD = .870), with human elements (M = 3.99) slightly exceeding non-human elements (M = 3.95). Transformational leadership was strongly associated with the educational environment (R = .864, R² = .746, adjusted R² = .745, p < .001). The four leadership dimensions jointly explained 75.2% of the variance, with intellectual stimulation producing the strongest unique standardized effect (β = .348). Gender differences were non-significant, whereas age, academic qualification, and teaching experience yielded significant small-to-moderate effects. Given the cross-sectional, self-reported design and absence of school-level identifiers, the findings indicate strong predictive relationships rather than causality. The study recommends integrated leadership development, participatory decision-making, individualized professional support, and sustained investment in inclusive digital and physical learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samira Ibrahim Mohammad Oraikat¹ (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: