Machine learning study demonstrates accurate prediction of solar pile uplift capacity from installation data, indicating penetration rate logging enables immediate on-site foundation assessment.
The rapid expansion of ground-mounted solar PV installations demands cost-effective, reliable pile foundations that resist wind-induced uplift. However, the uplift capacity of driven steel PV piles is difficult to predict, as conventional static formulas poorly capture the coupled effects of installation dynamics and site-specific soil conditions, often yielding over-conservative or unsafe designs. This study develops an interpretable, data-driven model to predict uplift capacity directly from parameters available during installation. A compact feedforward artificial neural network (4–16–8–1) was trained on 130 field load-test samples using penetration rate (PR), embedment length, soil friction angle, and steel cross-sectional area per unit length as inputs, with the uplift load at a maximum 20 mm displacement criterion as the target. The model, implemented in Keras/TensorFlow with min-max normalization, dropout, and early stopping, was evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation. The model achieved robust out-of-fold accuracy (R 2 =0.778, RMSE=0.787 t, MAPE=7.63%), with stable loss convergence across all folds and unbiased residuals dominated by irreducible site heterogeneity. SHAP interpretation identified penetration rate (49.8%) and friction angle (47.1%) as the dominant predictors, whereas geometric parameters contributed marginally. These findings demonstrate that accurate site characterization particularly real-time PR logging during driving is more decisive for maximizing uplift capacity than geometric optimization. Ultimately, the proposed model provides geotechnical engineers with a practical on-site tool: by logging the penetration rate during driving, they can estimate each pile’s uplift capacity immediately after installation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golpazir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: