Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates prospective exposure scoring improves IoT botnet quarantine under strict false-isolation budgets, suggesting graph models aid targeted network containment.
Post-detection Internet of Things (IoT) botnet mitigation requires identifying non-flagged endpoints that may require proactive quarantine while limiting unnecessary service disruption. This study presents a prospective exposure-risk scoring framework for quarantine decision support in software-defined networking (SDN)-based IoT environments. Per-second network telemetry is transformed into communication graphs and lightweight endpoint features. A first-stage anomaly signal provides the current suspected-compromise context, while prospective exposure is defined by whether a currently non-flagged endpoint communicates with a Stage-A-flagged endpoint at a subsequent prediction horizon. This design separates the prediction target from same-second suspicious-neighbour adjacency. Standard graph neural network models are evaluated against direct-neighbour and topology-agnostic baselines, while quarantine thresholds are selected on validation data to maximise recall subject to a false-positive-rate budget of 0.05. Experiments using CICIoT2023 packet-capture data and CICIoT-DIAD2024 show that the value of graph-based scoring depends on the traffic representation and evaluation scenario. On CICIoT2023-PCAP, graph models achieved substantially higher mean AUPRC than the topology-agnostic baseline, although performance varied across random seeds. On CICIoT-DIAD2024, the ordinary split showed no consistent graph-learning advantage, whereas under the evaluated scenario-disjoint Mirai condition, all three graph models achieved higher AUPRC than both the topology-agnostic MLP and the direct-neighbour rule. The findings demonstrate the potential of prospective exposure-risk scoring for controlled post-detection quarantine while highlighting the effects of telemetry representation and distribution shift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: