Computational evaluation demonstrates accurate student ability estimation in constructed-response tests through automated score imputation, indicating a reduced manual grading burden.
There is a growing need to assess students’ higher-order abilities, such as expressive skills and logical thinking.Constructed-response tests with short-answer and essay items have become widely adopted to meet this demand. Apersistent limitation of these tests is the substantial manual grading, making them both labor-intensive and costly. Itemresponse theory (IRT) offers a promising remedy by enabling ability estimation from incomplete score data, in whichhuman raters grade only a subset of answers across multiple test items. However, the accuracy of ability estimationdeclines as the proportion of missing scores increases. Although data-augmentation techniques for imputing missingscores have been explored to mitigate this issue, they often struggle to remain accurate under sparse or heterogeneousdata. To address these challenges, this study proposes a method that imputes missing scores by leveraging automatedscoring technologies to support accurate IRT-based ability estimation. The proposed approach attains high estimationaccuracy while markedly reducing the manual grading workload.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
伊藤 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: