Analytical and experimental study reveals significant geometric nonlinearity in pressurized viscoelastic cylinders, indicating that inner-wall finite deformations alter structural stress states.
The structural response of thick-walled cylindrical pressure vessels made of viscoelastic materials can be strongly affected by finite deformation. This study develops a successive approximation method for the geometrically nonlinear analysis of a case-bonded tubular solid rocket motor grain. A linear hereditary viscoelastic constitutive relation is combined with finite-deformation kinematics; thus, the nonlinearity considered is geometric rather than constitutive. The displacement, strain, and stress fields are expanded into asymptotic power series, from which a first-order linear solution and a second-order geometric nonlinear correction are derived. The resulting analytical solution is compared with the linear viscoelastic, initial-modulus, and equilibrium-modulus solutions to examine the effects of geometric nonlinearity, outer-to-inner radius ratio, and Poisson’s ratio. The model predicts pronounced geometric nonlinear effects near the inner wall, with strains approaching 80% in the investigated large-radius-ratio case. Cold pressurization tests were conducted for M = 4 and M = 6 over the pressure range of 2–10 MPa. The predicted inner-wall radial displacements agreed with the measurements, with relative errors below 15% under the tested conditions. The analysis further indicates that Poisson’s ratio can alter the stress state and may produce a triaxial compressive state throughout the vessel wall under the adopted assumptions. The proposed method provides an efficient analytical estimate of the geometrically nonlinear response of linear viscoelastic thick-walled cylinders. Material nonlinearity, damage, interface degradation, and broader loading conditions require further experimental and numerical investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: