Comparison of marginal bone loss using different abutment engagement techniques: a clinical study

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

There is no statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss between fully engaging and hemi-engaging abutment techniques in 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses over a 1-year period. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

So-Yee Ahn; Soo‐Hwan Byun; Su-Min Cho; Hyun-Sook Han; Byoung‐Eun Yang; Lee-Kyoung Kim

doi:10.14368/jdras.2026.42.3.181

August 31, 2026Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied ScienceOpen Access

Comparison of marginal bone loss using different abutment engagement techniques: a clinical study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Implication

Retrospective study observes equivalent marginal bone loss between fully engaging and hemi-engaging abutments in three-unit dental prostheses, suggesting flexible prosthetic design options.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Ahn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9934ea636c6408cfa7cabc https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2026.42.3.181

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Comparison of marginal bone loss using different abutment engagement techniques: a clinical study

No abstract yet

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Comparison of marginal bone loss using different abutment engagement techniques: a clinical study

No abstract yet

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading