Country report uncovers the trajectory of radical right Euroscepticism in Hungary, demonstrating how domestic sovereignty rhetoric and EU sanctions reshaped party governance through 2026.
This country report, prepared as part of the EUPopLink COST Action, examines the populism–Euroscepticism nexus in Hungary. It traces how Fidesz, in government since 2010, evolved from a pro-European liberal party into the dominant case of populist radical right Euroscepticism in the European Union, framing its conflicts with Brussels in sovereigntist, civilisational and nativist terms while remaining a net beneficiary of EU funds. The report situates Fidesz alongside other relevant actors—Jobbik and its successor Mi Hazánk on the radical right, the liberal Momentum, and the new centre-right challenger Tisza—and analyses their respective positions on European integration and how they responded to Brexit, COVID-19, the war in Ukraine, and Trump’s re-election. It further considers the strategic responses of pro-European opposition parties and the domestic and EU-level consequences of Fidesz’s “sovereignty-focused” Euroscepticism, including Article 7 proceedings, infringement procedures and rule of law conditionality. The report concludes with the watershed parliamentary elections of 12 April 2026, in which the pro-European Tisza Party ended sixteen years of Fidesz–KDNP rule, and reflects on what this signals for the future of the Hungarian populism–Euroscepticism nexus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denis Ivanov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: