Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical analysis reveals carbon emission trading reduces income inequality in Chinese cities by boosting labor income share, suggesting market-based climate policies can advance social equity.
As carbon pricing mechanisms gain global prominence, understanding their distributional impacts, particularly in developing economies, becomes crucial for the design of equitable climate policies. We explore the effect of carbon emission trading (CET) policy on income inequality in China through integrated theoretical and empirical analysis. We find that the CET policy significantly reduces income inequality, and this conclusion passed the robustness tests. Theoretical analysis shows that if carbon emission allowances are treated as an input factor of production, when carbon prices are relatively low, firms tend to substitute labor for carbon emission allowances, thereby increasing the labor income share (LIS). Empirical testing also confirms that the mitigation of income inequality through CET is attributable to the increase in the LIS. In addition, the equalizing effect is more pronounced in cities with higher initial income inequality and greater marketization. Government environmental expenditure and smooth labor market mobility also have positive synergistic effects. Our research provides policy insights on balancing emissions reduction with social equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: