Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational analysis demonstrates improved identification of stable cross-dock hubs across logistics networks, suggesting enhanced baseline screening over single-snapshot aggregation.
Background/Objectives: Selecting candidate cross-docking locations is a critical strategic decision in early-stage logistics network design. Conventional approaches often aggregate all demand data into a single planning snapshot, hiding the difference between consistently important locations and those attractive only under average conditions. This study proposes a demand-weighted spatial clustering framework for identifying temporally stable candidate cross-docking locations. Methods: The framework applies clustering to each monthly period independently and evaluates candidate centers through a cross-month stability analysis. K-Means++ is the main method, K-Medoids provides cross-validation, and DBSCAN serves as a density-based reference. Cluster counts are selected using a composite metric based on the Silhouette score, Davies–Bouldin index, and Calinski–Harabasz score. A stability score ranks candidate zones by combining frequency of appearance and demand weight. Results: On a real Turkish logistics dataset of 375,259 orders from 563 customers over 16 months, the framework produced 12 consensus candidate locations, eight appearing in all 16 months. A single-period baseline gave only nine candidates and missed four moderate-demand zones. A paired t-test showed the K-Means++ and K-Medoids difference was significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The framework offers a repeatable, data-driven approach to candidate-location screening as a structured input to subsequent sustainability-oriented network optimization models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ömer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: