Imam Al-Ramli's fundamentalist preferences in the discussions of speech، meaning، explanation، and consensus: an analytical study through the goal of hope
Textual analysis reveals Imam Al-Ramli's jurisprudential choices across foundational legal principles, highlighting systematic interpretive reasoning within Islamic legal theory.
Key Points
To examine Imam Al-Ramli's juristic choices and evidentiary reasoning within his commentary on Al-Juwayni's classical legal treatise, Warakat Al-Usul.
Conducted a structured analytical review of Al-Ramli's commentary across four thematic chapters: speech, meaning, explanation, and consensus.
Selected representative models from each legal theory chapter to trace points of dispute, scholarly disagreements, and underlying textual citations.
Identified Al-Ramli's definitive fundamentalist choices across core interpretive topics, clarifying how he resolved theoretical divergences among classical scholars.
Demonstrated that Al-Ramli systematically substantiated his doctrinal preferences using targeted textual proofs and traditional canons of legal interpretation.