Void evolution is the microscopic process governing ductile fracture in metallic sheets, yet the relative dominance of the multiple microstructural and geometric factors that regulate it remains unclear. In this study, a crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) model embedded with elliptical voids is constructed for 2219 aerospace aluminum alloy based on real electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) microstructures. Five factors: grain size, grain orientation, initial void size, void aspect ratio λ=b/a , and void azimuth angle β are systematically examined under uniaxial tension. To rank their dominance objectively, a maximum deviation metric is defined for each void evolution indicator X ∈ { f/f 0 , a/a 0 , b/b 0 , ( b/a )/( b 0 /a 0 )}. The results show that β and λ are the two dominant factors: at a macroscopic strain ε = 8%, β yields δ max = 34% for f/f 0 and 91% for the aspect-ratio indicator ( b/a )/( b 0 /a 0 ), while λ yields 21% for f/f 0 ; grain size, void size and texture produce δ max for all indicators below 16%. Because a multiplicative correction F ( λ )· g ( β ) cannot capture the λ-β coupling, an equivalent aspect ratio is derived through an equal moment of inertia mapping, and a modified Rice-Tracey growth law is established with C = 2.03 and D = 1.5. Validated against CPFE simulations and 100× scaled uniaxial tensile experiments, the model predicts f with a maximum deviation of 8.8% and b/a with 13.7%. Micromechanical analysis reveals that β and λ govern void growth by reconstructing the local hydrostatic stress triaxiality field and altering the Schmid-factor distribution and slip-system activation around the void. The findings provide a quantitative basis for multi-factor damage assessment and an efficient analytical model for ductile fracture prediction in aluminum alloy sheets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: