Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature review reveals prior disturbance and eutrophication trigger most macroalgal blooms across aquatic ecosystems, indicating restoration is essential to manage non-native species.
This review examined 275 papers containing 344 relevant mentions of blooms of native and non-native species of macroalgae along with the causes attributed to these phenomena. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that blooms of non-native macroalgal species are caused by a similar complex of factors that cause harmful blooms of native species rather than by aggressive traits of the non-native species themselves. From the reviewed literature, we extracted the main factors that triggered the blooms. Our analysis showed that in 96% of the cases examined, the ecosystem was already disturbed prior to the arrival of non-native species and the onset of macroalgal blooms. The causes were commonly attributed to eutrophication in 59.9% of cases and global warming in 15.7%, and only 3.5% of cases attributed the ecosystem damage to the aggressive characteristics of non-native species. Based on the literature, we developed a conceptual model of possible scenarios for both healthy and damaged ecosystems following the introduction of non-native opportunistic species of macroalgae. We argue that the current approach to combating non-native species cannot achieve results until the ecosystem is restored to health or finds a new balance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gubelit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: