Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Calculations of the Gibbs free energy of metallic hydrogen were made by the four most common methods and shown to be in good agreement with each other. In addition it is shown that the free-electron correlation energy commonly used in calculations on metallic hydrogen is approximately four times larger than the spread over the Gibbs free energy as calculated by the four methods. Because the free-electron correlation energy expression may be in error by a factor of 2 or 3, it represents the largest source of uncertainty currently facing an ab initio treatment of the metallic hydrogen phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: