Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genomic and phenotypic analysis demonstrates citrinin gene cluster disruption in Monascus ruber BC20, indicating safe food fermentation utility.
Monascus species are widely used in traditional fermented foods for pigment and flavor formation, but citrinin contamination remains a major safety concern that limits broader food applications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the citrinin risk of a furu-derived Monascus ruber strain, BC20, by integrating phenotypic screening across food-relevant matrices with genome-resolved analysis. After 14 days of cultivation across eight matrices, including fungal media as well as dairy-, cereal-, and bran-based substrates, citrinin was not detected by immunoaffinity cleanup combined with HPLC–FLD (LOD, 4 μg/kg; LOQ, 12 μg/kg). To investigate the genetic basis of this phenotype, we generated a chromosome-scale genome assembly for BC20 and conducted comparative analyses across a total of 19 Monascus genomes. ANI analysis and phylogenomic inference consistently placed BC20 within the ruber–pilosus clade. Comparative synteny analysis showed that the citrinin-associated locus in BC20 no longer retained an intact cluster configuration but instead exhibited a remnant-locus architecture, and similar patterns were also observed in several related genomes from the same clade. By contrast, the monacolin K (mk) locus remained syntenically conserved in BC20, supporting locus-specific structural disturbance rather than assembly-derived pseudo-absence. Additionally, its antifungal susceptibility was determined. Overall, BC20 represents a M. ruber candidate strain with undetectable citrinin, and this study provides a practical analytical framework for citrinin risk screening in food-related Monascus isolates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: