Key result
Higher SIRI and NLR linked to up to ~47% greater odds of carotid plaque.
Why the study?
To examine the associations of NLR, SIRI, and MHR with carotid plaque in middle-aged and older adults.
Do higher systemic inflammatory indices (NLR, SIRI, and MHR) associate with the presence of carotid plaque in middle-aged and older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=433)
No
Do higher systemic inflammatory indices (NLR, SIRI, and MHR) associate with the presence of carotid plaque in middle-aged and older adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.47 (95% CI 1.05–2.07)
p-value: p=0.026
Higher systemic inflammatory indices, particularly SIRI and NLR, are independently associated with the presence of carotid plaque in middle-aged and older adults, though their modest discriminative ability suggests they should be used as adjunctive markers rather than standalone screening tools.
To examine the associations of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) with carotid plaque in middle-aged and older adults. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 433 patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent carotid ultrasonography at Kunshan Second People’s Hospital between January 1, 2024, and February 28, 2026. Clinical and laboratory data were collected, and NLR, SIRI, and MHR were calculated. The primary multivariable analysis used complete cases ( n = 374) because high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a prespecified covariate, was missing for 59 participants (13.6%). Sensitivity analyses used the full cohort ( n = 433) in models excluding hsCRP. Associations were examined per standard deviation increase, and restricted cubic spline models evaluated dose-response patterns. NLR, SIRI, and MHR were higher in the plaque group ( n = 244) than in the non-plaque group ( n = 189) (all P < 0.001). In fully adjusted complete-case models, NLR (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.02–1.79; P = 0.039) and SIRI (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.05–2.07; P = 0.026) were associated with carotid plaque, whereas MHR was not (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.84–1.70; P = 0.326). In full-cohort sensitivity analyses, estimates remained directionally similar but were attenuated for NLR (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.99–1.62; P = 0.059) and SIRI (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96–1.64; P = 0.095). SIRI showed a graded association across quartiles (P for trend = 0.031), and no statistically significant interactions were detected. Higher NLR and SIRI were associated with carotid plaque in complete-case analyses, although the associations were attenuated in full-cohort sensitivity analyses. The modest discrimination (AUC 0.610–0.642) indicates that these indices should be considered exploratory adjunctive markers rather than standalone screening tools. Prospective validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid plaque (n=433). Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) vs. Lower levels (per standard deviation increase) was evaluated on Presence of carotid plaque (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.05-2.07, p=0.026). Higher systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with increased odds of carotid plaque (OR 1.47 and OR 1.35, respectively) in middle-aged and older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: