Numerical modeling demonstrates that 20% corner chamfers optimize oscillation frequency and pressure drops in fluidic oscillators, highlighting applications in active flow control and heat transfer.
A backward-facing step fluidic oscillator (BFSFO) was modified by creating chamfers at step and Eddy corners with variations from 20% to 80%. Analysis was conducted using CFD methods involving an SST k-ω turbulence model. Reynolds numbers ranged from 3 × 10⁴ to 5.5 × 10⁴. Results concluded that a 20% step corner chamfer model is highly optimal for active flow control devices, capable of producing significan frequency ( f ) (an average increase of 5.44%), reducing average pressure drop (ΔP ave ), and maintaining an optimal pressure fluctuation (PF). Conversely, a 20% Eddy corner chamfer configuration shows an excellent ability to reduce ΔP ave , while maintaining a notably high PF. This is achieved by shrinking recirculation bubble size within mixing chambers. Therefore, this specific Eddy corner chamfer BFSFO model is highly recommended for use in combustion or heat transfer applications. Frequency increases across baseline, step, and Eddy corner chamfer models occur due to higher velocity return flows inside feedback channels, which helps accelerate jet movement cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iskandar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: