Simulation study demonstrates enhanced target-lane completion and safety screening in mixed freeway traffic during CAV rule transitions, indicating improved execution reliability under uncertainty.
Freeway connected and automated vehicle (CAV) priority lanes (CPLs) provide dedicated or preferential road space for CAVs, but access-rule transitions require CAVs, connected vehicles (CVs), human-driven vehicles (HDVs), and trucks to reorganize within a finite control zone. This paper develops a three-layer framework that links robust target-lane assignment, online executability screening, and continuous control through a common state and surrogate-safety-measure interface. A six-slot robust mixed-integer program supplies a feasible incumbent, robustness-enhanced beam search retains alternative lane sequences, and local integer-programming repair corrects restricted conflicts. The middle layer checks retained assignments using gap time, time to collision, deceleration rate to avoid a collision, and post-encroachment time. The lower layer uses extended-Kalman-filter-assisted control-barrier-function model predictive control (EKF-CBF-MPC). Across 180 matched closed-loop scenarios per upper-layer method, the complete framework achieves 98.2% target-lane completion and 100.0% planned-PET pass, compared with 89.5% and 49.8% for direct six-slot robust MIP. Mean access-rule satisfaction is 65.4% and 67.9%, respectively. In 100 matched parameter-mismatch runs, EKF initialized from the present HDV prior reduces one-second speed and net-gap prediction RMSE by 74.5% and 79.6% relative to the matching fixed-parameter predictor; a published highD prior gives similar online errors. Communication-fault experiments further evaluate state prediction, command expiry, lane-change deferral, and local fallback control. The results show improved execution reliability and conflict screening, with a modest rule-compliance and computation-time trade-off relative to robust MIP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: