Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods study reveals low health-promoting behaviors linked to psychological resilience in oceangoing seafarers, highlighting the need for tailored maritime workplace interventions.
Purpose: This study aimed to identify factors associated with health-promoting behaviors among Korean oceangoing seafarers using a quantitative approach and to explore their experiences of health-promoting behaviors using a qualitative approach. Methods: A mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected from 132 Korean oceangoing seafarers, all of whom were male, with a mean age of 48.4 years. Structured questionnaires were used to measure health-promoting behaviors, hardiness, self-efficacy, and social support. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with health-promoting behaviors. Qualitative data were obtained through two focus group interviews with eight seafarers and analyzed using content analysis. Results: The mean score for health-promoting behaviors was 2.23 on a 4-point scale, indicating relatively low engagement in health-promoting behaviors. Hardiness, self-efficacy, education, exercise, and job stress explained 56.5% of the variance in health-promoting behaviors, with hardiness showing the strongest association. Qualitative analysis identified three themes reflecting seafarers' health-promoting behaviors: difficulties in maintaining health in the shipboard environment, health management and institutional support for protecting seafarers' health, and habituation of health-related behaviors during long voyages. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of psychological resources, including hardiness and self-efficacy, in sustaining health-promoting behaviors among oceangoing seafarers. Tailored nursing interventions and health promotion programs that reflect the unique occupational environment of maritime workers are needed to support healthier lifestyles among seafarers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: