Key result
Multimodal AI achieves ~91% accuracy for clinical CEAP classification of venous duplex ultrasound reports.
Why the study?
To develop and internally validate a prototype multimodal artificial intelligence system for automated CEAP classification of venous duplex ultrasound reports.
Can a multimodal artificial intelligence system accurately automate CEAP classification from venous duplex ultrasound reports?
Observational (n=1,000)
No
Can a multimodal artificial intelligence system accurately automate CEAP classification from venous duplex ultrasound reports?
A multimodal AI system can accurately automate CEAP classification from venous duplex ultrasound reports, potentially streamlining vascular services.
Supports multimodal AI feasibility for CEAP automation in venous reports; leaves open external validation before clinical adoption.
Objective To develop and internally validate a prototype multimodal artificial intelligence system for automated CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological) classification of venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) reports, integrating natural language processing of free-text components with computer vision analysis of hand-drawn anatomical diagrams. Methods Single centre retrospective observational study using routinely collected clinical data. One thousand consecutive venous duplex ultrasound reports from Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK (July 2024 – May 2025) were labelled according to the CEAP classification, excluding the Etiological component, which could not be reliably determined from duplex reports alone. Transfer learning was applied using ClinicalBERT for text and MobileNetV3 for diagrammatic data. Clinical classes were predicted from request line text. Text- and image-based pathophysiological models were developed for four anatomical territories (Great Saphenous Vein, Small Saphenous Vein, Deep system, Perforators), combined using late fusion with probability averaging. Results The clinical CEAP model achieved accuracy of 0.91, macro-F1 of 0.82, and macro-AUC of 0.98. Pathophysiological prediction varied, with text models broadly outperforming image models. Fusion yielded heterogeneous benefits, improving SSV performance but reducing Deep system accuracy. The performance of the final pathophysiological CEAP fusion models varied across anatomical territories: accuracy ranged from 0.70–0.92 and macro-AUC from 0.80–0.92. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of automated CEAP classification from VDUS reports. Despite class imbalance affecting minority class predictions, the strong discriminatory performance validates this multimodal ML model for extracting clinically meaningful information from real-world data. This approach offers potential, pending external validation, to streamline vascular services through automated triage and guideline-compliant decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cutteridge et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Venous disease (n=1,000). Multimodal artificial intelligence system was evaluated on Clinical CEAP classification performance (Accuracy 0.91, macro-AUC 0.98). A multimodal artificial intelligence system achieved an accuracy of 0.91 and macro-AUC of 0.98 for clinical CEAP classification of venous duplex ultrasound reports.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: