Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study reveals FDG PET/CT metabolic metrics track disease resolution in extraspinal musculoskeletal tuberculosis, indicating its value for personalizing treatment duration.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in monitoring treatment response and determining treatment end points in patients with extraspinal musculoskeletal tuberculosis (MSK-TB) receiving anti-tubercular therapy (ATT). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 62 patients with extraspinal MSK-TB underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT before ATT, with follow-up scans at 6, 12, and 18 months. Total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and lesion-to-liver standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) were recorded. Clinical, laboratory, and MRI findings were used as reference standards for healing. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified PET/CT parameters associated with ATT beyond 18 months. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients completed the final PET/CT follow-up. Significant reductions in TLG, SUVmax, and SUVR were observed during treatment (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated that a ≤43% reduction in TLG, ≤46% reduction in SUVmax, and ≤26% reduction in SUVR between baseline and 6-month scans, and a ≤66% reduction in TLG, ≤36% reduction in SUVmax, and ≤30% reduction in SUVR between baseline and 12-month scans, were associated with the requirement for ATT beyond 18 months. The mean time to complete clinicoradiological healing was 19.23 ± 1.49 months, whereas the mean time to complete metabolic response on PET/CT was 18.54 ± 2.27 months, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.30). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool for monitoring treatment response in extraspinal MSK-TB. Early changes in PET/CT parameters may predict treatment duration, and PET/CT findings closely correlate with disease healing, supporting its use in guiding individualized ATT duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banjara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: