China's food security strategy is shifting beyond cultivated land-based grain production toward diversified food sources and ecological sustainability. Grasslands play a critical role in this transition, supporting livestock production while providing multiple ecosystem services. However, agricultural intensification and cultivated land–grassland competition increasingly threaten their multifunctionality. Taking Inner Mongolia, a region that epitomizes these challenges, as a case study, this research develops a static ecological risk diagnostic framework under current (2024) land-use, integrating ecosystem service assessment and evaluation of land-use alignment with natural conditions. The results show that medium risk areas dominate Inner Mongolia (82.14%) and are primarily associated with ecosystem service-related risks. Among these, ecosystem services conflict on grasslands represents the largest share (58.97%), where high habitat quality co-occurs with low water yield and soil conservation. In terms of land-use alignment, although cultivated land is theoretically subject to broader natural constraints, a larger proportion of existing grassland lies within highly constrained environments. High risk areas further reveal contrasting risk patterns: cultivated land unsuitability is mainly associated with multiple ecosystem service deficiencies, whereas grassland vulnerability consistently co-occurs with ecosystem services conflict. These risk patterns imply different management priorities. High-risk cultivated land highlights the need for ecological restoration to recover ecosystem functionality, whereas widespread medium-risk grasslands call for landscape-scale enhancement of service synergies through region-specific and multi-stakeholder collaboration. The proposed framework provides a transferable approach for identifying restoration priorities and guiding sustainable land-use planning in Inner Mongolia and other agro-pastoral regions, supporting the coordinated achievement of both ecological and food security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: