Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review outlines management of biological therapy failure in inflammatory bowel disease, highlighting therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dose escalation versus drug swapping.
Biological therapies have transformed the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients experience primary non-response or secondary loss of response during treatment. This phenomenon represents a major therapeutic challenge and often requires treatment optimization strategies. Among these, dose escalation increasing dosage or interval shortening, and switching to a drug with a different mechanism of action (swap) are the most frequently considered approaches. The decision between these strategies depends on several factors, including the type of therapeutic failure, drug serum concentrations, anti-drug antibodies and the patient’s clinical context. Therapeutic drug monitoring has emerged as a key tool to identify mechanisms of treatment failure and guide clinical decision-making. This article reviews the magnitude of loss of response to biological therapies in IBD, especially to anti-TNF agents, describes the underlying mechanisms and summarizes the available evidence to guide the choice between dose escalation and switching therapeutic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
JM Benítez Cantero (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: