Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Geometric analysis uncovers the duality between the circle of similitude and an unnamed orthogonal circle, indicating that naming disparities reflect historical transmission rather than geometry.
Each external common tangent of two disjoint circles, centres O1 and O2, meets each internal one in a point, and these four points lie on one circle — the circle on O1O2 as diameter, a circle the classical literature states but never names. Its named twin, the circle of similitude, is orthogonal to it. This essay walks the pair through a single draggable figure: from Thales' right angle, through Newton's mean-proportional relation and its inversive twin, to the parabola that Menaechmus first drew for the sake of two mean proportionals. The asymmetry of names — one circle with a title and a literature, one with a descriptive clause — is measured along the way, and turns out to be a fact about transmission, not about geometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manabu Higashida (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: