Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Econometric analysis reveals that Federal Reserve statement entropy accounts for 30% of household inflation forecast errors, indicating communication directly influences public tail-risk beliefs.
This paper integrates extreme value theory, rational inattention, and social learning into a framework for inflation expectations under heavy-tailed signals. The framework delivers a tail-biased worst-case forecast, entropy-dispersion tail dependence that rises in the tail index and falls in attention capacity, a globally attracting social learning steady state, and an optimal heavy-tailed signal. In quarterly United States data from 2000 to 2025, headline inflation has a heavy upper tail, Federal Reserve statement entropy explains roughly 30 % of the variation in household survey forecast errors, and the slope of forecast bias on tail-loss covariance flattens after the 2012 inflation target adoption. The structural levers are communication entropy and the inflation tail index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omid M. Ardakani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: