Cross-sectional survey reveals clinical and psychological factors tied to heightened parenting concerns in parents with cancer, indicating the need for targeted family and practical support.
Objective To examine sociodemographic, clinical, and support-related factors associated with parenting concerns among Japanese parents with cancer raising children aged <18 years. Methods This secondary analysis used data from a cross-sectional web survey previously conducted to validate the Japanese Parenting Concerns Questionnaire (PCQ). Invitations were sent to 2,852 members of a Japanese online patient support network, and 174 parents responded. PCQ analyses were restricted to 157 participants who selected Married in the survey marital-status variable. The PCQ total score was the primary outcome, and three subscales were exploratory outcomes. Multiple linear regression analyses used a post hoc parsimonious model and an expanded forced-entry sensitivity model. Results Participants had a median age of 45 years, and 145 (83%) reported female sex. In the parsimonious total-score model, higher PCQ scores were associated with female sex (B = 5.33, 95% CI 1.03-9.64), uterine/ovarian cancer (B = 6.19, 95% CI 1.00-11.38), chemotherapy (B = 3.54, 95% CI 0.11-6.96), a self-reported past/current psychiatric history (B = 5.46, 95% CI 2.43-8.49), and reported wanting practical support with parenting (B = 5.74, 95% CI 1.98-9.49). In the expanded model, the associations with uterine/ovarian cancer, chemotherapy, self-reported past/current psychiatric history, and reported wanting practical support with parenting remained, whereas the female-sex association was attenuated (P = 0.076). Subscale findings were exploratory and several were model-dependent. Conclusions Despite the limited single-network sample and low response rate, this study found that parenting concerns were associated with several self-reported characteristics and preferences for parenting support. However, these exploratory cross-sectional findings do not establish causal relationships or provide sufficient evidence to justify clinical targeting. Further confirmation in larger and more representative samples is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: