Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates automated survival tracking in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected silkworms, highlighting a scalable platform for antimicrobial efficacy screening.
Silkworm infection models offer a low-cost in vivo platform for antimicrobial screening, but repeated survival assessment is labor-intensive. We developed a time-lapse Faster R-CNN workflow for a silkworm Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain PAO1) infection model. In a primary benchmark, 508 of 570 expert-annotated larval instances (89.1%) were detected at prespecified thresholds. Among these instances, classification accuracy was 94.7%, Cohen’s kappa was 0.743, infection-killed sensitivity was 70.8%, and precision was 85.2%. Because individual larvae were not tracked, outputs were analyzed as count-based survival trajectories. The pool-adjacent-violators algorithm (PAVA) had a negligible effect on time-integrated trajectories (< 0.01%) and did not change group ordering. Across two independent PAO1 experiments, meropenem-treated groups consistently showed higher time-integrated survival proportions than untreated infected groups. The workflow supports automated group-level antimicrobial efficacy screening under defined imaging conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: